At a time of increasing global economic integration and cross-border transactions, tax authorities around the world are taking steps to enhance transparency and combat tax avoidance. The compulsory...

At a time of increasing global economic integration and cross-border transactions, tax authorities around the world are taking steps to enhance transparency and combat tax avoidance.
The compulsory disclosure regulations established by Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 on 25 May 2018, concerning obligatory automatic information exchange in the area of taxation related to reportable cross-border arrangements, also referred to as DAC6, represent one such effort to enhance the information exchange among Member States of the European Union (EU).
More specifically, DAC6 is a directive passed by the EU with the primary objective of fostering tax transparency and combating aggressive tax planning. It requires intermediaries, and in some cases, taxpayers themselves, to report specific cross-border arrangements to tax authorities and mandates automatic exchange of this information among Member States. The directive is part of the wider international effort to curb tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance.
This article will delve deeper into DAC6 and its impact on Cyprus, shedding light on the importance of these rules for businesses operating in Cyprus.
Cyprus, as an EU member state, is obligated to implement DAC6 into its domestic legislation. The directive came into effect in Cyprus on 1 July 2020, and from January 2022, all legacy reportable cross border arrangements subject to DAC6 in Cyprus, must be reported to the Cyprus Tax Department (CTD).
The DAC6 regime in Cyprus is governed by:
For cross-border transactions to be required to report to the CTD, they must meet at least one of the hallmarks. The hallmarks are detailed in the legislation on DAC 6, where five categories of hallmarks are foreseen, divided into generic and specific. The generic hallmarks and certain specific hallmarks can only give rise to reporting obligations if they fulfil so called ‘main benefit test’. This test is met only if the main benefit or one of the main benefits that a person takes from an arrangement is to obtain a tax advantage.
The categories where the hallmarks are divided, and which are detailed in the DAC6 legislation, are the following:
The main benefit test is crucial in determining the reportability of a cross-border arrangement under DAC6.
DAC6 obliges intermediaries, such as tax advisors, lawyers, and financial consultants, to disclose certain cross-border arrangements that have the generic or specific hallmarks. In some cases, the obligation may shift to the taxpayer if there is no intermediary or if the intermediary is protected by legal privilege.
More specifically, the definition of intermediary includes:
Also, in order for a person to be considered as Intermediate, the following conditions must be met:
Where a particular intermediary is located outside the EU or is exempt from disclosure due to legal professional privilege, the disclosure obligation lies with another intermediary or, in the absence thereof, with the taxpayer concerned.
Every intermediary or concerned Taxpayer must provide the CTD with the DAC 6 data on reportable cross-border arrangements that they are aware of, possess, or control. This information should be submitted within a 30-day period calculated as follows:
The information to be submitted includes, inter alia, the following:
A synopsis of the reportable setup, including a mention of its commonly known name, if applicable, and a general overview of the pertinent business operations or agreements, without revealing any trade, industrial, or professional secrets or commercial procedures or information that, if disclosed, would violate public policy.
Non-adherence to the reporting obligations can lead to severe fines based on the rationale for such non-compliance. The fines are detailed below:
The CTD issued the interpretative Circular 55 providing clarifications in relation to the imposition of DAC6 penalties. The Circular, among other details, includes the following provisions:
an annual fine limit of EUR 120,000 will be imposed on reportable cross-border arrangements with a reporting deadline within a calendar year. This annual limit is not applicable if the fine is a result of a willful violation or fraud committed by the intermediary / relevant taxpayer;
A 50% decrease in the penalty levied on a reportable transnational arrangement will be applicable when the intermediary or relevant taxpayer has undertaken 'remedial measures' prior to the deadline for filing the income tax return of the year in which the reporting obligation originated. The 50% reduction does not reduce the yearly penalty cap of EUR 120,000; and
all relevant taxpayers or intermediaries are required to maintain books and any other documents that could be associated with a reportable cross-border arrangement for a minimum duration of six (6) years from the conclusion of the tax year that the cross-border arrangement pertains to.
DAC6 represents an important shift towards transparency and cooperation in cross-border tax arrangements within the EU. Cyprus, as an EU member state, has incorporated and implemented these rules, making it crucial for businesses operating in the country to comply with the reporting obligations.
Businesses are advised to seek professional advice to ensure that they fully understand the legal status regarding DAC6 and are ready to meet their reporting obligations, thus avoiding possible penalties and legal issues in the future.
Compliance with these rules will not only promote a transparent business environment but also contribute to the wider international effort to fight tax avoidance and evasion.
Ensure compliance with DAC6 and other regulations by consulting with our experts. Contact us today to learn more about setting up your business in Cyprus.

Managing Partner
Managing Partner with a distinguished career in corporate and commercial law, trust law, tax law, property law, litigation, and immigration law. First-Class LL.B. from the University of Leicester and LL.M. from the University of Cambridge.
View profileContinue Reading
The total cost of registering a Cyprus company depends on far more than the incorporation fee. This guide breaks down setup costs, government fees, banking, nominee services, and annual maintenance, and explains what low-cost providers often leave out of their quotes.
There is no single best country to open a company in Europe. The answer depends on your business model, where your clients are, and how much you are willing to spend on compliance. This guide compares seven EU jurisdictions across the factors that actually matter.
Opening a company in Cyprus takes 5-7 working days — but the decisions you make before registration matter more than the paperwork. This guide covers who should incorporate in Cyprus, how to plan for tax residency, what it actually costs to run a company each year, and the mistakes that trip up most foreign entrepreneurs.
Related Services
Free Consultation
Book a free, no-obligation consultation with one of our experienced lawyers. As one of the most established law firms in Paphos, we're here to help you navigate the legal landscape of Cyprus with confidence.
No fees. No obligations. Speak with a qualified lawyer today.