11 min read
DAC7 Cyprus explained: which platform operators must register with the Tax Department, reportable sellers, due diligence and the 31 January reporting deadline.

Written by Sergios Charalambous, Partner
Cyprus Bar Association
Most generic explainers restate the directive and leave you no wiser about the one question that matters: does my platform actually have to register in Cyprus, and by when? This guide answers that directly, maps each exclusion to a worked example, gives the exact Cyprus law and portal steps, and flags where a lawyer must confirm your penalty exposure.
DAC7 is the seventh amendment to the EU's Directive on Administrative Cooperation, formally Council Directive (EU) 2021/514, which amended Directive 2011/16/EU. It brings the digital and gig economy inside the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) that already covers bank accounts and cross-border rulings. In short, it makes marketplaces report what their sellers earn so that tax authorities across the EU can match declared income against platform data.
For years, tax authorities struggled to see income earned through apps and websites: a host letting a flat on a booking site, a freelancer selling services, a trader shifting goods through an online marketplace. DAC7 closes that gap. From 1 January 2023 the rules applied across the EU, with the first exchange of information required by 31 January 2024. The logic is simple: if a platform already knows what a seller was paid, the tax authority should know too.
DAC7 is one strand in a growing family of reporting regimes, and confusing them is a common mistake. DAC6 targets intermediaries who must disclose certain reportable cross-border tax arrangements. DAC7 targets digital platform operators reporting seller income. DAC8 extends automatic exchange to crypto-asset service providers under the OECD's CARF framework. They share the same DAC lineage but impose separate obligations on different actors. If you run a marketplace and a crypto service, you may fall under more than one. See our guides to DAC6 reporting of cross-border arrangements and DAC8 and crypto-asset reporting in Cyprus for the neighbouring regimes.
Cyprus brought DAC7 into national law through the Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation (Amending) Law of 2023, N.105(I)/2023, gazetted on 3 November 2023. That law implements Council Directive (EU) 2021/514, which itself amends the parent Directive 2011/16/EU. The Cyprus Tax Department administers it.
The Cyprus statute reproduces the directive's architecture: the definitions of Reporting Platform Operator, Reportable Seller and Excluded Seller, the four relevant activities, the due diligence procedures, and the reporting and exchange mechanics. Because it is a faithful transposition, the OECD Model Reporting Rules for Digital Platform Operators are a useful interpretive backdrop, but the operative text for a Cyprus platform is the Cyprus law itself.
The reporting obligation applies from the 2023 calendar year onwards. That means the first reporting period covered 2023, with the first report due in early 2024, and each subsequent calendar year generating its own report the following January. For the 2025 reporting period, the report is due by 31 January 2026. Operators should always confirm the live cycle with the Tax Department rather than assume a fixed date, because extensions have been granted.
You are a Reporting Platform Operator if you operate a platform (software, a website or an app that connects sellers with users) that facilitates a relevant activity, and you have an EU nexus. In Cyprus, that nexus exists where the operator is tax resident here, is incorporated here, has its place of management here, or maintains a permanent establishment here.
Any one of these four connecting factors is enough. A company incorporated in Cyprus that runs a marketplace is caught even if managed from abroad. Equally, a foreign company managed from Cyprus, or one operating through a Cyprus permanent establishment, can be caught. Because the tests are alternatives rather than cumulative, many operators are surprised to find themselves in scope. This is where the beneficial ownership picture matters too, so review the Cyprus UBO register and beneficial ownership compliance alongside your DAC7 assessment.
A platform with no EU nexus is not off the hook. If it facilitates a relevant activity by an EU-resident seller, or the rental of immovable property located in the EU, it must register in a single EU Member State of its choice, and that Member State can be Cyprus. The only relief is where the operator's home jurisdiction has a qualifying exchange agreement that transmits equivalent information to the EU. If no such agreement applies, a non-EU platform choosing Cyprus registers and reports here just like a resident operator.
DAC7 covers exactly four relevant activities carried out for consideration. If your platform facilitates any of them, it is in scope; if it facilitates none, it is not a reporting platform for DAC7 purposes.
This is the activity that catches short-term rental marketplaces. A platform that lets Cyprus hosts advertise and rent out apartments, villas, commercial units or parking is facilitating a relevant activity, and the host's rental income becomes reportable. Hosts should make sure the figures they declare align with what the platform reports; our guide to how rental income is taxed in Cyprus and the practical short-term rental rules for Cyprus hosts set out the underlying tax position.
The other three activities capture the gig and marketplace economy: freelancing and task platforms (personal services), online marketplaces (sale of goods), and vehicle, boat or equipment rental marketplaces (transport rental). A goods marketplace should read this alongside the VAT OSS scheme for cross-border B2C sales, because DAC7 income reporting and VAT registration are separate obligations that often arise together.
A Reportable Seller is any seller (an individual or entity) registered on the platform, resident in an EU Member State or renting out EU immovable property, who performs a relevant activity, unless they fall within a defined exclusion. The exclusions are precise, and applying them correctly is where the real compliance work sits.
| Excluded seller category | Test | Worked example |
|---|---|---|
| Government entities | The seller is a governmental entity | A municipality renting municipal parking through a platform |
| Publicly traded entities | The seller (or a related entity) is listed on a stock exchange | A listed hotel group letting rooms via a booking site |
| Large property operators | More than 2,000 relevant rental activities per listed property in the period | A hotel with over 2,000 bookings for the same listed unit in the year |
| Casual goods sellers | Fewer than 30 sales of goods and total consideration not exceeding EUR 2,000 in the period | An individual who sold 12 items for EUR 900 total during the year |
These are excluded because their income is already visible through other channels. A listed company or a state body does not need platform-level reporting to be transparent to the tax authority.
A property operator with more than 2,000 relevant rental activities for a single listed property in the reporting period is excluded. The rationale is that such an operator is effectively a hotel-scale business, already on the tax authority's radar, and the platform need not report it. Note the threshold is per listed property, not per operator overall.
A goods seller is excluded where the platform facilitated fewer than 30 sales for that seller and the total consideration did not exceed EUR 2,000 during the period. Both limbs must be satisfied. Cross either threshold (a 30th sale, or a euro over EUR 2,000) and the seller becomes reportable for the whole year. This exclusion applies only to the sale of goods; there is no equivalent de minimis for rentals, services or transport.
Not every business that looks like an intermediary is a Reporting Platform Operator. DAC7 carves out operators whose function does not amount to facilitating a relevant activity for a known consideration.
Three functions typically fall outside the definition of a platform for DAC7. First, businesses whose sole activity is processing payments in relation to a relevant activity (payment processors) are not reporting platforms on that basis alone. Second, platforms that only list or advertise a relevant activity, without any onward step toward a transaction, are excluded. Third, platforms that merely redirect or transfer users to another platform are excluded. The dividing line is whether you facilitate the transaction and see the consideration, or simply advertise or process a payment. Because these carve-outs are worded narrowly, confirm your exact classification against Law 105(I)/2023 before concluding you are out of scope.
A platform can also qualify as an Excluded Platform Operator where, by the nature of its business model, it never has Reportable Sellers, for example because all its sellers fall within an excluded category. Such an operator can be relieved of the reporting obligation, but it must be able to demonstrate the position to the Tax Department, so the analysis should be documented rather than assumed.
A reporting platform must collect and report a defined dataset for each Reportable Seller. The data splits into seller identification, financial and consideration figures broken down by quarter, and additional details for property rentals.
For each seller the platform reports the name, primary address, Tax Identification Number (TIN) and the jurisdiction that issued it, the VAT number where available, and the date of birth for individuals or the business registration number for entities. Getting the TIN right is central, because the whole regime works by matching platform data to a taxpayer record.
The platform reports, for each quarter of the reporting period, the total consideration paid or credited to the seller, the number of relevant activities the consideration relates to, the financial account identifier used for payment, and any fees, commissions or taxes the platform withheld or charged. Quarterly granularity lets tax authorities test the figures against periodic filings.
Where the relevant activity is the rental of immovable property, the platform reports additional information for each listed property: the address, the land registry number or its equivalent where available, and the number of days the property was rented during the period, together with the type of listing. This is what lets an authority reconcile a host's declared rental income against actual occupancy.
DAC7 does not let platforms report whatever data happens to be on file. Operators must run due diligence to collect the required seller information and satisfy themselves it is reliable, completing that exercise by 31 December of the reporting period.
The platform must gather the identification data above and then apply reasonableness checks, using the records available to it (including from other AEOI or AML processes) to confirm the information is plausible and consistent. Where a seller fails to provide required data after two reminders, the platform must, following a defined waiting period, either close the seller's account or withhold payment until the information is supplied. Due diligence is therefore not a one-off form but an enforceable process with consequences for the seller.
Due diligence on sellers must be completed by 31 December of the reporting period, ahead of the January reporting deadline. For sellers already on the platform, operators may rely on due diligence completed in earlier periods within the limits the law allows, but new sellers must be diligenced within the period they join.
Reports are due by 31 January of the year following the reporting period, and the reporting period is the calendar year. So the 2025 period is reported by 31 January 2026, the 2026 period by 31 January 2027, and so on. Diarise this alongside your other filings using the 2026 Cyprus company compliance calendar.
The 31 January date is the fixed statutory deadline, running in parallel with the EU-wide requirement that the first exchange occur by 31 January 2024. A submission made after the deadline is treated as overdue and may attract administrative penalties under N.105(I)/2023.
Cyprus has shown willingness to extend the deadline in practice. For the first reporting year (the 2023 period), the Cyprus Tax Department pushed the deadline from 31 January 2024 to 16 February 2024. That was a one-off concession for the inaugural cycle, not a standing rule, so operators should never plan around an extension. Always confirm the current cycle's deadline with the Tax Department.
Registration and filing run through the Government Gateway Portal (CY Login). A Reporting Platform Operator first completes Platform Operator Registration, then submits its annual data as XML files in the OECD standard schema.
The Tax Department publishes a DAC7 Registration and Data Submission User Guide setting out the portal steps. Registration is the gateway: without it you cannot submit, and an operator that should have registered but did not is exposed on both counts.
Data must be submitted in the OECD standard XML schema, not a free-form spreadsheet. Platforms with significant seller volumes usually automate schema generation from their internal systems. Budget time to validate the XML against the schema before the deadline, because rejected files that are corrected after 31 January count as late.
Administrative penalties apply under Law 105(I)/2023 for failing to register, for late, incomplete or missing reporting, and for due diligence failures. The escalation mechanism and, ultimately, revocation of registration are set out in the law, but the precise euro figures should be confirmed for your situation rather than assumed from secondary summaries.
The Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation (Amending) Law of 2023, N.105(I)/2023, provides for administrative penalties across the range of breaches. Published secondary sources do not consistently state the exact amounts, so the specific figure applicable to a late or missing report should be verified against the law text or the relevant Tax Department decree with a Cyprus adviser before you rely on it.
Beyond monetary penalties, the directive-based enforcement mechanism bites hardest here: where non-compliance continues after two reminders from the Member State of registration, the platform operator's DAC7 registration is permanently revoked. For a marketplace that depends on lawful EU operation, losing its registration is a materially more serious outcome than a fixed fine.
Sellers are not passive. A seller who ignores requests for required data faces account closure or the withholding of payments by the platform after the reminder process. That gives platforms a practical lever, but it also means sellers should respond promptly to a platform's DAC7 requests rather than treat them as optional.
Use this as a first-pass self-assessment, then take advice on the grey areas.
DAC7 rewards operators who get the classification right early and punishes those who guess. At Philippou Law Firm we assess whether your platform is a Reporting Platform Operator with a Cyprus nexus, apply the seller and operator exclusions to your actual business model, and confirm your registration, due diligence and reporting obligations under Law 105(I)/2023. We also verify the live deadline and your specific penalty exposure, coordinate the Government Gateway registration and XML submission, and align your DAC7 position with your wider VAT, corporate and beneficial ownership compliance. If you run a marketplace, a booking site or a gig-economy platform touching Cyprus or the EU, contact us for a scoped DAC7 review before the next reporting cycle.
Book a free 30-minute consultation with a partner.
Book free consultation
Partner
Partner specializing in corporate and tax law. Member of both the Cyprus Bar Association and the Athens Bar Association, bringing expertise across both jurisdictions.
View profile
Cyprus crypto firms must report under DAC8 and CARF by 30 June 2027 for 2026 data. See who is an RCASP, what to capture now, and how to avoid a data gap.
VideoIn the fast-evolving online economy, digital marketers, social media consultants, and SEO professionals are increasingly seeking efficient ways to manage their income, reduce tax exposure, and scale...

How content creators, influencers and YouTubers use a Cyprus company in 2026: 15% corporate tax, 0% non-dom dividends, VAT on ad revenue and the IP Box reality.
Related Services
“Fabulous service from everyone at Philippou Law. We moved here in July and had our immigration sorted with Nikolas and Laura, our tax residency, non-dom and the opening of our business was seamlessly done by Cleo, and we are also buying our house with them, where Maria and Elpida have been wonderful. Honestly I would not go anywhere else. Many thanks all.”
Free Consultation
Book a free, no-obligation consultation with one of our experienced lawyers. As one of the most established law firms in Paphos, we're here to help you navigate the legal landscape of Cyprus with confidence.
No fees. No obligations. Speak with a qualified lawyer today.